<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safari 3.0 is vulnerable to Phishing attack - Here is the proof</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mymindleaks.com/internet/safari-30-is-vulnerable-to-phishing-attack-here-is-the-proof/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mymindleaks.com/internet/safari-30-is-vulnerable-to-phishing-attack-here-is-the-proof/</link>
	<description>Live with Feel of Technology and Blogging</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Selección Digital&#187; es.appleweblog.com &#187; Listo Safari 3.2 ¡con anti-phishing!</title>
		<link>http://mymindleaks.com/internet/safari-30-is-vulnerable-to-phishing-attack-here-is-the-proof/#comment-1197</link>
		<dc:creator>Selección Digital&#187; es.appleweblog.com &#187; Listo Safari 3.2 ¡con anti-phishing!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mymindleaks.com/safari-30-is-vulnerable-to-phishing-attack-here-is-the-proof#comment-1197</guid>
		<description>[...] fin y después de mucha crítica y controversia, Safari se actualiza y ahora integra tecnología [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] fin y después de mucha crítica y controversia, Safari se actualiza y ahora integra tecnología [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davinder</title>
		<link>http://mymindleaks.com/internet/safari-30-is-vulnerable-to-phishing-attack-here-is-the-proof/#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>Davinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mymindleaks.com/safari-30-is-vulnerable-to-phishing-attack-here-is-the-proof#comment-796</guid>
		<description>I surf 90% of time in IE and rest in FF. I guess IE did pass the above test. Yeah, Safari be careful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I surf 90% of time in IE and rest in FF. I guess IE did pass the above test. Yeah, Safari be careful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.320 seconds -->
